<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPlayer: search resolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technogoggles.com/2008/11/iplayer-search-resolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technogoggles.com/2008/11/iplayer-search-resolution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kostya</title>
		<link>http://www.technogoggles.com/2008/11/iplayer-search-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Kostya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technogoggles.com/?p=299#comment-525</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://znk.videotapes.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://qhn.videotapes.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gmd.videotapes.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://qsh.videotapes.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Хм..&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://opk.videotapes.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://qr3.videotapes.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://agd.videotapes.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fsm.videotapes.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://znk.videotapes.ru" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://qhn.videotapes.ru" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://gmd.videotapes.ru" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://qsh.videotapes.ru" rel="nofollow"> </a>&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Хм..<b><a href="http://opk.videotapes.ru" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://qr3.videotapes.ru" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://agd.videotapes.ru" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://fsm.videotapes.ru" rel="nofollow"> </a>&#8230;</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankie</title>
		<link>http://www.technogoggles.com/2008/11/iplayer-search-resolution/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>frankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technogoggles.com/?p=299#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I guess the BBC have to weigh up whether it&#039;s worth removing iPlayer pages from the Google index (via a robots meta-tag) when the videos are no longer available. They&#039;ll lose some inbound traffic, but might improve the user experience (after all, the pages don&#039;t have a lot of value without the video, as all the textual information plus more is available on the equivalent /programme page).
One point you got wrong, albeit understandably, is that the BBC&#039;s programme ontology (which uses the pids) DOES have the concept of &#039;a series&#039;, and even a programme &#039;brand&#039; - however only the episodes themselves get an iPlayer page currently. There is a /programmes page for series and brands though - eg see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006m8q4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Something Special&lt;/a&gt;.
I discuss the distinction between iPlayer pages and /programmes pages &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frankieroberto.com/weblog/898&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;over on my blog&lt;/a&gt; - increasingly it seems a bit pointless to have 2 pages for the same programme, other than for &#039;marketing&#039; reasons...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I guess the BBC have to weigh up whether it&#8217;s worth removing iPlayer pages from the Google index (via a robots meta-tag) when the videos are no longer available. They&#8217;ll lose some inbound traffic, but might improve the user experience (after all, the pages don&#8217;t have a lot of value without the video, as all the textual information plus more is available on the equivalent /programme page).<br />
One point you got wrong, albeit understandably, is that the BBC&#8217;s programme ontology (which uses the pids) DOES have the concept of &#8216;a series&#8217;, and even a programme &#8216;brand&#8217; &#8211; however only the episodes themselves get an iPlayer page currently. There is a /programmes page for series and brands though &#8211; eg see <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006m8q4" rel="nofollow">Something Special</a>.<br />
I discuss the distinction between iPlayer pages and /programmes pages <a href="http://www.frankieroberto.com/weblog/898" rel="nofollow">over on my blog</a> &#8211; increasingly it seems a bit pointless to have 2 pages for the same programme, other than for &#8216;marketing&#8217; reasons&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
